NEED HELP!: Have you read Nixon and Mao: The Week That Changed The World?

jarkofjarkof Regular
edited December 2010 in Life
I have a paper to write by wed and I really dont have time to read this entire book. If anybody read it can you kind of summarize it up. I have to include the answers to these questions in my summary:
What made the world represented by Nixon and Mao so far apart?
Besides the political differences, what was the most difficult barrier the two world leaders, and there staff, had to overcome in order to cooperate with each other?
Why does Macmillan(Writer of the book) assert that the week Nixon spent in China changed the world?
How can this book relate to the issues of globalization.

Also if anybody was alive and old enough to understand when Nixon visited china please explain your personal thoughts on the matter.

Whether I pass this class really depends on my grade on this paper. I would not ask for help unless I was sure I needed it. If anybody helps thank you so much.

Comments

  • edited December 2010
    I wish I could help, but I haven't read the book :( Bumping this thread might help a little though, so that's all I can offer.
  • MayberryMayberry Regular
    edited December 2010
    Your best bet would be to ask Chester.

    (I can't believe I said that :o)
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited December 2010
    I've never read the book but I may be able to help you out because I know a lot about the situation and both leaders. The meeting did change the world and is basically the reason we and China aren't at war. Now this is all from memory of what I've read on it so my facts could be slightly off.

    They were world apart for the main Reason that China was Marxist and America was in a cold war against the Soviet union. However this was around the time of the sino soviet split so China and Russia weren't exactly allies either.

    A big issue was how could Nixon meet with Mao while still appearing to be tough on communism. This is as well as Chinese involvement in conflicts like Korea and Vietnam made the situation between the 2 powers tense.

    This led to the creation of our economic partnership with China. before Nixons visit there was no cooperation between the 2,

    This is why it changed the world then and today and is a big reason i think Nixon was a great president. First I'll ask you this. Why are America and China not at war? Because neither country can do it because our economic dependence on each other makes it impossible.

    Another thing to keep in mind is how the improving Sino-American relations put pressure on the USSR at the time and I can into that more if you want.
  • edited December 2010
    Pakistanis sniff cum
  • DirtySanchezDirtySanchez Regular
    edited December 2010
    All fucking wrong. The exact reason Nixon COULD go to China was because he was tough on communism. Hence the expression, "Only Nixon could have gone to China"
    This meeting didn't join us economically, it only aligned us both firmly against the Soviet Union.
    China had and has no reason to go to war with the United States, they are military isolationist.

    Going to China dosnt make you tough on Communism in fact most anti communists were pissed about the visit. It opened the door to how we rely on each other economically now. Isolationism has nothing to do with why there isn't war. It has to do with the fact that their economy would collapse immediately and this is because of Nixons visit which normalized relations between the 2 powers. Of course 1 week didnt create it but it laid the foundation to all this.
  • edited December 2010
    Pakistanis sniff cum
  • jarkofjarkof Regular
    edited December 2010
    Okay I just havent read the book and it needs to relate directly to the book I knpow a lot of the facts. You are both technically correct. The week did change the world in many ways. It reunited china and the us economically and allied us together. It opened up a new trade market and allowed china to take its rightful spot in the UN where Taiwan sat in there place. It showed that even though we run very separate economies from capitalism to socialism we are able to work together. The purpose of the visit was many including the want for another ally above the soviet union and for many economic reasons but one of the biggest parts about the week was to tie things off with an old enemy and allow trade with one of the biggest trade nations in the world. I do know the stuff well and can half ass a paper its only I dont know how to relate the information to the book. So i am just hoping that someone that has read the book maybe will be able to tell me Margaret Macmillans's views on the situation. Maybe I should post this in a more political forum. Who is the mod for this forum. You should move this down to Politics: Left Right Center
Sign In or Register to comment.