So at my college, the feminist club recently held this program called, "What is Man?"
I attended the event, to get poon, but was fucking annoyed when all it turned out to be was a bunch of feminists talking about typical feminist shit (the Other, masculine gaze, etc) with a handful of men present - LAME!
I did drop a good line about the two most masculine jobs in the US of A being Combat Infantry and Carpenters though, "Man, the builder and destroyer."
Cool story bro.jpg
I'm not buying it.
It's funny that most of the feminist dykes are so busted, that they aren't even good for fucking.
Feminists = worthless.
To hear this come from a woman is good and I agree with you. What feminism more or less is now is trying to push for the dominant role.
It wasn't until the woman's rights movement emerged that women finally were able to confront these theological lies that they were inferior to men in all aspects and could take their rightful place in society. And it wasn't until the scientific disciplines of physical anthropology and sociobiology showing intellectual differences to be insufficient; as I explained in the Men vs Women thread in Oh the humanities (of course varying between different races as also explained in that thead).
Feminism arose when women were oppressed more than any other (although voting is a bullshit sense of democracy- negroids got the vote before white women), and weren't even allowed a say in their own lives. Today's feminism is just degrading to all parties and looks for female supremacism. Not all varieties subscribe to those ideals, just like not all strains of anarchism subscribe to the same ideals.
There's some feminism I'm all for
Supposedly no one adjusted that figure for different generations. Maybe for 64 year old women it's true, but anymore women make the same that men do. There is no gender gap except in what jobs are chosen. I got paid the same wage that everyone else on my level did when I was teaching at the university. The women were paid the same as me. So I don't know how the fuck they can continue to spout this 76 cent bullshit.
The only reasons women would earn less than men in the same position doing the same work is if they don't work as many hours. Overall women earn less than men because:
1. they take time off for family. If you want kids, you don't get a career. It's that simple. Sure, you can get a job when your kids are old enough, or you can put them in daycare. In some countries you can get time off for maternity and raising kids. Not in the US. If you want to be competitive, don't have kids.
2. They don't work hard enough. You can't make partner at the law firm if you don't put in your 10+ years and work your ass off 70+ hours a week. Supposedly a lot of women aren't willing to demonstrate delayed gratification. The top paying careers are the ones you have to do shittons of schooling for: engineering, doctor, lawyer, other hard sciences, etc. If you don't spend years and years going to school and then work your ass off to get to the next level, you won't make it. No one is going to hand you $200,000 per year unless you're some rich fuck who inherited it.
3. they pick careers that don't earn money: teaching, support roles, secretary, paralegal, waitressing, etc.
4. they don't see themselves as breadwinners, so they don't work as hard to get promotions, etc.
5. they change their place of employment a lot, meaning they start over on the payscale. This one happens to a lot of people, but it's a reason some will be paid less than others. Seniority counts.
That's your problem right there.
Now I perhaps think otherwise.
To be clear it's the fems I can't see eye to eye with on this, not all women. I just feel like they're keeping some kind of score trying to win a game no one else cares to play. Women are better than men in some ways, men are better than women in some ways. We can make it a battle, winning being the only goal or we can all benefit, accepting the things we lack
Anyhow just my opinion/rant, didn't expect to go on so much
This is not true.
Asian males make more money than any other demographic, including white males, and they tend to be very docile, unassertive and non-aggressive.
White males are pretty much the same way. Low testosterone.
Black males and black females on the other hand tend to be very assertive and aggressive, more so than Asian males and white males, and they make much less than both white males and Asian males.
The real reason why women and non-Asian minorities tend to make less money is simple: they cannot perform to the same abilities as the others.
Having to hire women and minorities is a real pain for most employers, because it is basically the equivalent of giving away welfare. Women especially make terrible employees. They are always skipping work and due to maternity they sometimes even take months off.
Pay is about performance, not assertiveness.
1.) White males of Jewish origins (highest performing, greatest success)
2.) Asian males of east-Asian origins (second highest performing, second greatest success)
3.) White males of eastern-European prigins with maximum Jewish ancestry
4.) White males of Mediterranean origins with maximum Jewish ancestry
5.) White males of eastern-European origins with moderate Jewish ancestry
6.) White males of Mediterranean origins with moderate Jewish ancestry
7.) White males of eastern-European origins with minimal Jewish ancestry
8.) White males of Mediterranean origins with minimal Jewish ancestry
9.) Asian males of east-Asian ancestry
10.) Hispanic males of meso-American ancestry living in the USA (higher than average workplace performance despite low pay due to archaic USA immigration systems)
11.) Hispanic females of meso-American ancestry living in the USA
12.) Asian females of east-Asian ancestry
13.) White males of non-eastern European and non-Mediterranean ancestry
14.) Sub-Saharan Africans, Central Africans, East Africans
15.) Asians of south-Asian ancestry
This applies to athletics workplaces as well. China and various eastern-European nations tend to dominate international athletics (in the case of the eastern-European nations, relative population size and funding available for athletic teams has to be taken in to account lest an unfair judgment be cast in the form of absolute number of medals acquired, also European warfare must be taken in to consideration (holocaust, holodomer, etc).
Interesting. Do you have a source?
Now that's an accurate picture of reality. We totally never seen any of those guys ever making any dough.
You are either immature and can't get your head around the fact that wherever your live doesn't represent the whole of america or you are delusional beyond belief
Wow, you're going to be shoveling that pile for a long time. Hopefully you're a Jewish shit shoveler.