|
Odometer Rollback Schemes
NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.
ODOMETER ROLLBACK SCHEMES
By
James E. Scripture
Special Agent, FBI
Boston, Massachusetts
With the expense associated with purchasing a new motor
vehicle and the proliferation of leased and rental cars in
recent years, odometer tampering has become a very lucrative
criminal activity. This is why this activity is now recognized
as a serious form of white-collar crime. Odometer tampering
involves reducing the high mileage figure on used vehicles and is
often accompanied with title laundering. Prime targets are
formerly leased, high-mileage vehicles that are 1 to 2 years old
and still retain a polished appearance. (1)
Odometer rollback schemes represent a pervasive fraud that
costs consumers billions of dollars annually. In fact,
statistics compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Association (NHTSA) conservatively estimate the aggregate annual
wholesale loss in the United States as a result of these
schemes at approximately $3 to $4 billion. This calculated
dollar loss is based on fraudulent, wholesale markups and not
retail sales. Also, increased repair, maintenance, and safety
costs associated with rollback vehicles are not included in the
estimates. (2)
Surprisingly, the commission of odometer fraud is not
limited to the stereotypical American used car dealer. The
monetary incentives associated with turned back odometers and
laundered automobile titles entice individuals at every level of
the automotive industry. Participants may include automobile
auction operators, new car franchise holders, registry of motor
vehicle (RMV) officials, and new car manufacturers.
Furthermore, these offenses can be extremely difficult to
detect, investigate, and prosecute; they are generally
perpetrated by intelligent individuals who develop elaborate,
highly organized, and complicated schemes. Yet, some rollback
operations uncovered by investigators were elementary and
amateurish.
THE VARIETY OF SCHEMES
Falsifying Titles
One of the most primitive odometer rollback schemes occurs
when a dealer purchases a high mileage vehicle in the name of the
automobile dealership and subsequently resells it with a
falsified, reduced odometer reading. This is accomplished merely
by altering the high-mileage figure noted on the title or by
obtaining a new automobile title with a false mileage figure
before reselling the vehicle.
The major disadvantage to altering only the odometer figure
on the title is discovery. In most cases, these simplistic
alterations are of poor quality and can be easily detected at
automobile auctions by RMV officials who diligently examine title
documents.
Altering Titles
This odometer rollback scheme is perhaps the most efficient.
In this scam, the offending dealer employs a professional
calligrapher or an artist to perform superior quality title
alterations, which are often very difficult to detect with the
naked eye.
Reassigning Titles
In most States, licensed automobile dealers can accept and
transfer vehicle titles without reregistering them in the
dealership's name. This is done by attaching an automobile
dealer's reassignment of title form to the original automobile
title. Numerous title reassignments may accompany an original
title, as well as the washed title.
Also, offending dealers often manufacture phony title
reassignments for a rollback vehicle in an attempt to avoid
culpability. An offending dealer may also discard, rather than
alter, prior reassignments of title, making it difficult to
trace ownership of the vehicle. The practice of discarding
and/or destroying title reassignments is called stripping a
title.
Title Laundering
Another type of odometer roll-back scheme occurs when
offending dealers attempt to circumvent the problems associated
with title alterations by purchasing title documents issued in
the names of out-of-state automobile companies. This method
involves surrendering an automobile title that contains a reduced
mileage figure to an out-of-state registry of motor vehicles
(RMV). The vehicle is then reregistered in the name of a
company or dealership in another State, and the issued title,
which contains the reduced mileage figure, is reassigned back to
the offending dealer, creating a phony paper trail.
This false title history creates an unaltered title that
distances the offending dealer from the odometer rollback. This
new automobile title is referred to as a clean, washed, or
laundered title. Because offending dealers always maintain
physical possession of the vehicles in question until they are
sold, geography is never a concern. In most cases, the only
items that cross State lines are the phony title documents.
ROLLBACK OPERATIONS
Odometer Clockers
Initially, an offending automobile dealer makes minor
cosmetic improvements to a vehicle, such as washing and waxing
it. In addition, items such as brake pedals, tires, and floor
mats, which are subject to noticeable amounts of wear and tear,
are replaced. Then, the dealer usually pays a mechanic or
another individual, referred to as a clocker, to turn back the
odometer.
The price for each turn back varies, depending on the degree
of difficulty associated with each vehicle. A proficient clocker
can complete a rollback job in a matter of minutes by using such
common tools as picks, wires, or screw-drivers. This enables the
clocker to service a large number of vehicles in a relatively
short period of time. These vehicles are subsequently sold on a
retail basis directly from the offending dealer's lot, or more
commonly, transported to one of numerous automobile auction
houses in the United States.
Automobile Auction Houses
An automobile auction house is an integral part of many
scams. Auction houses often encourage offending dealers to
purchase high mileage vehicles from them in order to realize
larger profits from high volume sales. An individual who intends
to alter the odometer reading of a high mileage, attractive
vehicle will frequently pay these wholesale automobile
distributors or auction houses a price in excess of fair market
value in order to secure the product. Appearance is important
because the odometer will be altered and the vehicle sold at a
commensurately higher price. Thus, the offender can afford to
outbid legitimate automobile dealers for the same automobile
because the higher cost is tempered with an illegal profit. Many
auction houses even underwrite the sale.
The auction house serves as a commissioned broker during
these transactions and rarely takes title to the vehicles. This
method makes it extremely tempting for an auction house to
transact business with known or suspected offending dealers who
routinely negotiate high volume wholesale transactions.
In addition, auction houses that allow the dealer to take
physical possession of formerly leased vehicles usually do not
demand payment until they are sold. However, an auction house
tries to protect its investment by maintaining possession of the
title to each vehicle until payment is received from the dealer.
This arrangement is possible because auction houses allow
licensed dealers to sell automobiles at auction without
immediately conveying the title to the purchasing dealer. This
practice is referred to as selling a vehicle ``title attached,''
meaning that the title transfer generally lags behind the
physical transfer of the vehicle anywhere from a few days to 2
weeks.
Straw Dealerships
Title laundering schemes can involve the creation of
dealerships under someone else's name. These businesses are
commonly known in the automobile industry as straw dealerships.
Straw dealerships are used at strategic positions in a
vehicle's title chain to deflect the criminal activity away from
the offending dealership. The straw dealership usually does not
maintain a vehicle inventory on its lot and operates in name
only. Often, depending on the dealer registration and automobile
titling requirements of the State where the title will be washed,
the dealership's address may actually correspond to a vacant lot,
a residence, a post office box, or a telephone answering service.
Rarely, if ever, will the straw dealership take physical
possession of the automobiles involved in the rollback scheme.
Straw dealerships almost never maintain records, such as
odometer statements and sale documents, which are required to be
maintained under Federal law for a period of 4 years. These
dealerships will eagerly pay the fines associated with
noncompliance of required record keeping rather than maintain
documentation that would implicate them in criminal activity.
Straw dealerships usually operate only for a few months
before they are dismantled and moved to a different city or State
under a new business name. This mobility makes it difficult for
law enforcement authorities to identify those responsible for the
scheme. In addition, an offending dealer may further complicate
the vehicle's title history by using multiple straw dealerships
in a series of fabricated transactions. A dealer can also pay a
straw dealer to assume all of the risks from purchasing high
mileage vehicles to selling them with falsely reduced mileage.
In this case, the user's name appears on none of the related
paperwork, and the offending dealership does not appear to take
possession of the rollback vehicles at any time.
APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS
In 1972, in recognition of the magnitude of the odometer
rollback problem, Congress enacted the Motor Vehicles Information
and Cost Savings Act (MVICSA), (3) seeking to eliminate odometer
tampering. This act established certain safeguards to protect
consumers because they often rely heavily on the odometer reading
to determine the vehicle's value, safety, and reliability. The
act made it a Federal violation to disconnect, reset, or replace
an odometer for the purpose of disguising a vehicle's true
mileage. (4)
Depending on the circumstances, the primary Federal
statutes that may be used in odometer-related prosecutions are
Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2314, Interstate Transportation of
Stolen Property (ITSP) and Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 513,
Possession of Forged or Altered Securities. Section 513
contains two extremely desirable features, the first being that
the interstate transportation of the forged, altered, or
counterfeited document is not a requirement for prosecution
(unlike section 2314); rather, it makes the mere possession of
such a document illegal. It defines forged and counterfeit
documents as any which purports to be genuine but is not because
it has been falsely made, falsely altered, or falsely completed.
The Federal statutes contained in Title 18 of the U.S. Code
pertaining to Mail Fraud, Section 1341; Conspiracy, Section 371;
False Statements, Section 1001; and Fraud by Wire, Section 1343,
are also cited in the indictments.
In October 1986, the Truth in Mileage Act of 1986 (TIMA)
was signed into law, modifying MVICSA. (5) The primary features of
TIMA dealt with title security, mileage disclosure, lease
vehicle disclosure, dealer record retention, and lessor and
auction record retention. It also increased the criminal and
civil penalties applicable to MVICSA.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
Statutes (6) were originally intended for use in organized crime
prosecutions. However, the RICO statutes can be interpreted to
also include odometer rollback and title laundering activity.
(7) Sections of the statutes contain offenses that Congress
defined as constituting acts of racketeering and are the primary
statutes traditionally used to prosecute odometer crime. (8)
The combined provisions of MVICSA, TIMA, and RICO
legislation and other traditional criminal statutes form an
intimidating platform from which to base antiodometer fraud
strategy. These statutes allow for substantial civil and
criminal penalties against, and/or forfeiture from, those dealers
who continue to engage in such criminal enterprises.
CONCLUSION
Today, rollback and title laundering schemes can range from
crude to brilliant. They are limited only by the criminal's
imagination. Neither geographical barriers nor titling
requirements pose insurmountable obstacles to individuals who are
committed to carrying out their schemes.
Unfortunately, years may pass before consumers realize that
they have been the victim of odometer rollback crime, if they
ever do. In the rare instances where dealers are caught, they
usually enthusiastically negotiate a financial settlement with
the customer in order to avoid negative publicity and potential
civil or criminal proceedings.
At best, this means detection by law enforcement agencies is
difficult, time consuming, and expensive. For the criminal,
odometer tampering represents a relatively low-risk method of
achieving substantial personal wealth.
FOOTNOTES
(1) U.S. Senate, Hearing on S.1407, pp. 32-33.
(2) U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Final Rule Implementing the Truth in
Mileage Act, April 1, 1988, pp. 78 and 82.
(3) Motor Vehicles Information and Cost Savings Act (MVICSA),
15 USC sec. 1981-1991.
(4) 15 USC sec. 1984.
(5) Public law 99-579.
(6) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
Statuts contained in 18 USC sec. 1961-1968.
(7) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
Statutes, Sections 1341 (Mail Fraud), 1343 (Wire Fraud), and 2341
(ITSP) contain offenses which Congress defined as constituting
acts of racketeering activity.
(8) Ibid.
|
|
