About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Politics
Anarchism
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Corporatarchy - Rule by the Corporations
Economic Documents
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Foreign Military & Intelligence Agencies
Green Planet
International Banking / Money Laundering
Libertarianism
National Security Agency (NSA)
Police State
Political Documents
Political Spew
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Terrorists and Freedom Fighters
The Nixon Project
The World Beyond the U.S.A.
U.S. Military
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Talking in Their Sleep

Michael Bakunin once observed that "The State, any State - even when it dresses up in the most liberal and democratic form - is necessarily based upon domination, and upon violence, that is, upon despotism - a concealed but no less dangerous despotism... The State, or political right, denotes force, authority, predominance; it presupposes inequality in fact." (GP Mazimoff - The Political Philosophy of Bakunin - Free Press 1953).

For the most part, the despotic lash is hidden, and we're fed stories of the guarantees of personal liberty embodied in the traditions of parliamentary democracy. We're told that representative politics ensures stability and underwrites freedom. Democracy, we're told, is what we have, and what the less "fortunate" - such as the "prisoners of Stalinism" who brought down the physical and metaphorical walls which divided Europe in the "democratic" revolutions of 1989 - aspire to. Parliament, and its earthly champions - MPs, party workers, the fourth estate et al - guarantees our citizenship, now and for all times.

One of the endlessly recycled currencies of romantic fiction is the story of the cheating lover who betrays himself through talking in his sleep. Occasionally, the baggage handlers and bell boys of the ruling class get caught out in the same way, muttering in a kind of complacent half sleep, and in the process revealing that which is normally concealed. Churchill, for instance, in 1927 said of Mussolini's fascist dictatorship, "Your movement has abroad rendered a service to the whole world... Italy has shown that there is a way to combat subversive forces." We may be reminded also of Lord Chesterfield's reported comment that "arbitrary power" should be introduced "by slow degrees, and as it were, step by step, lest the people see it approach."

Recently, both Lord Lamont and Guardian writer Hugo Young have been musing aloud in a manner which suggests their fidelity to their beloved "democracy" might be open to question. Lord Lamont has been mailing potential friends of General Pinochet, asking them to pledge support for the "ailing dictator". "Remember" he tells them, "General Pinochet's only crime was that he stopped communism in South America." Thousands were killed in Chile following the 1973 overthrow of the elected social-democratic Allende government, and thousands more were tortured. All political opposition to the junta was banned. Books were burned, bodies piled high in football stadiums, and as the US journalist William Blum recounts (Killing Hope - Black Rose Books 1998), "soldiers slit the trouser legs of women, shouting that in Chile women wear dresses; the poor returned to the natural state; and the men of the world in Washington and in the halls of international finance opened up their cheque books." So murder and torture are not crimes if done to preserve "social order". Clearly as our Tory friend is aware; we cannot rush to judgement of such brutality. Who knows when such methods might be our resort against the poor here?

So much then for Lamont, a stalwart of the right. In the Guardian on 30/11/99 we were treated to Hugo Young's thoughts on the Musharraf coup in Pakistan ("Pakistan's Latest Putsch is the Kindest Coup of all"). Democracy, Young tells us, is not an event, but a process. It "does not live by votes alone." Parliamentary democracy, (particularly in Asia and Africa, he is keen to stress) is undermined by "flagrant vote bullying, a void in the rule of law." Because the overthrown Sharif government was irredeemably corrupt, so "democracy" may require a breathing space. Musharraff, for Young, "appears to be better than your average general...He may not yet have made the trains run on time, but he does stop at the lights." Young is a good liberal and does not go so far as to endorse a permanent military dictatorship in Pakistan; "the pressure to make democracy a living truth needs to be unremitting." But pressure it seems can mean many things, Sharif was a blatant fraudster whose rule left many amongst the poorest in Pakistan entirely disenchanted with the notion that democracy and "parliamentary democracy" were one and the same thing. Young knows this full well. He concedes therefore that while "the anti-democrat has no merit" - "Making people love democracy is the only way to keep them free." Thus an armed dictatorship can come to be the "least worst" option, if only for now. Better a general committed to making the poor "love democracy" again (perhaps by making voting compulsory?) than that the poor be given the opportunity to devise forms of democracy of their own.

It's good, as we're told, to talk - helpful too to eavesdrop on the pillow talk of the chattering classes. The "conditional" democrats who rule over us do more, though, than talk. In February 1998 the British government took out a High Court injunction against former Daily Mirror foreign editor, Nicholas Davies, in an attempt to frustrate publication of his book, Ten-Thirty-Three. After a protracted legal fight, the book has now been published by Mainstream Publishing. Ten-Thirty-Three was the code number given to Brian Nelson, the chief intelligence officer for the Ulster Defence Association, and also a member of the Force Research Unit, a hand-picked section of British Military Intelligence set up to target Republicans. Davie's book draws on high-ranking sources within military intelligence to reveal the collusion between the British Army and Loyalist death squads, a collusion sanctioned throughout by the government. Davies reveals how British Army intelligence gave details of nationalist activists to Nelson, providing photos, names, addresses and car registration numbers to facilitate their successful targeting and execution. Planned operations were co-ordinated through the London - based Joint Intelligence Committee. Using Nelson to direct the UDA, the Force Research Unit was implicated in at least 15 murders and 15 attempted murders, including the murders of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane, Gerard Slane, 66 year old Francisco Norarintino, Billy Kane, Terry McDaid and Brendan Davidson.

In his book, Davies reveals that one of the actions taken by the Thatcher government was the reconstitution of a high level security directorate, the Joint Irish Section, under M15 control, in Northern Ireland. All FRU operations were passed through the JIS, which reported weekly to the Joint intelligence Committee - in effect, to Thatcher herself - in London. a When Nelson was arrested in 1991 and charged with conspiracy to murder and collecting information likely to assist terrorism, a deal was struck whereby he would be sentenced to 10 years, released in 1994, given a complete change of identity, relocation to a house worth £100,000 and a £75,000 lump sum, on condition he keep his mouth shut. The court and press were spun a tale of how the brave Nelson, working to thwart "UDA murder gangs" had helped save 217 lives through providing information to Military Intelligence. Davies reveals that, since he began writing his book, two of his inside sources have been threatened with "executive action", as he puts it, "the customary expression for murder".

Unlike most journalists, who're quite content to kiss the hand that feeds, Davies has been brave enough to seek to expose the machinations of the British State's "dirty war" in the north of Ireland. What the anti-democratic musings of the likes of Lamont and Young reveal, though, is that what was practised on the streets of Belfast will be transferred to the streets of Manchester or London or wherever required, whenever the "people" need to be persuaded to "love democracy" again. Talking in their sleep, our "democratic" politicians and press show us that , to recall Bakunin again, "...to offend, to oppress, to despoil, to plunder, to assassinate or enslave one's fellow man is ordinarily regarded as a crime. In public life, on the other hand, from the standpoint of patriotism, when these things are done for the grater glory of the State, for the preservation or the extension of its power, it is all transformed into duty and virtue."

 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
george galloway what do you think of him?
Hinchey Amendment
why UK accepts US subjugation and infiltration?
George galloway suspended from HP
Why Marxism IS Economically Exploitive...
Situation in Turkey
Putin not playing nicely
So, I hear they have Mcdonalds in China...
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS