|
Neo-Liberalism And Globalization
by MRTA
Extreme Poverty
In Latin America, the wave of privatizations demanded by the
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have ended up as
a recipe for unemployment, throwing thousands of workers out
onto the street to join what is already an army of the unemployed.
The largely unresolved contradictions of our continent have become
polarized. We believe that South America is the weak link in the
transnational imperialist chain in the era of "globalization".
The political and economic ideas diffused by the imperialist
bourgeoisie and their intelligentsia have no other purpose than to
annihilate a section of our society. We will attempt to analyze these
ideas in a scientific fashion. A task to which the "progressive and
revolutionary" intelligentsia should contribute again, as it seems
they entered into a period of self-censorship some time ago. As a
political organization which has developed in the heart of the
people, we will attempt to express these ideas in a language which
is as simple as possible, without losing their scientific rigor. This
method, and our practical actions, keep us in the hearts and minds
of the people, despite the wishes of many who are still trying to
make themselves believe the cries of victory for Fujimoriism, and
others who announced our destruction at every possible
opportunity, while apologizing for the dictatorship. It is not our
intention to fall into using "fashionable terminology", but we
consider it an obligation to clarify concepts, which some people
formerly active in "revolutionary" and "progressive" circles starting
using, thereby only creating confusion and false hopes in our
people.
At a time when the so-called "neo-liberal model" is showing its true
self, there have been a series of violent social protests, as in
Mexico, Venezuela, Argentina, etc. , which proves that did not
achieve the results they claimed it would, and that they can no
longer sell false hopes to the millions of poor people pushed into
conditions of extreme misery, in Peru, in our Andes, and in the
whole of the continent.
"The Statements Of Intentions"; Or A Program For The Neo-Colonies
In the shadows of the "Statements of Intentions" developed by the
International Monetary Fund, they are proceeding to privatize the
land, natural resources, and that which remains of our industry.
These "Statements" are the real programs of the (neo-colonial)
governments of Latin America and have been the cause of massive
unemployment, poverty, and extreme misery, and they condemn
millions of people to death through starvation, like in Somalia. It is
in these conditions that the people of Peru and Latin America, and
their revolutionary organizations, must plan a scientific and
objective alternative to this murderous and genocidal system.
The Peruvian people have struggled against and survived the
greatest economic genocide conceived by the ruling classes since
the conquest. From 1975, the ruling class has been trying to put
their neo-liberal plan into action, but the organized response of the
masses has impeded this. However, in 1990, despite popular
resistance, shock tactics were employed and we are now living with
the brutal consequences.
Liberalism And Neo-Liberalism
This "model", theoretically originating from the theories of the
liberal classics of Adam Smith and David Ricardo, is being applied
in the age of globalization. However, if we emphasize our class
differences with the classics of bourgeois economics, that does not
mean to say that we overlook their contribution to general
economic theory: the theory of work-value, which with other class
elements serves as the basis by which the injustice of capitalist
economic theory is revealed, where those who create the wealth
which circulates in the world do not have access to it. Aside from
the subjective question of justice and injustice, this system created
the revolutionary class: the proletariat, which by its capacity to
create wealth and by its form of social organization within the
productive precess is the only one capable of forging a radical
alternative to capitalism. The crisis of capitalism is not created by
the scarcity of goods, like in the economies before capitalism, but
by their excess. From this point of view, the so-called "neo-
liberals" are further from Smith and Ricardo than Marxism; their
bourgeois apologists are neither willing nor able to enter into a
debate about the "theory of value", and instead they attempt to
reduce the creation of products and wealth to the omnipotent power
of capital and the market. Maybe they do not want to know that
capital exists as a product of the value accumulated and created by
the workers, which is then concentrated and appropriated into
private hands. On this point, which is the backbone of liberalism,
there is no convergence with the neo-liberals. In the same way, the
"free trade" proposed by the liberals has no connection with the
commercial monopoly exercised by the globalizers, or
multinational monopolists (imperialists). According to Jonathan
Elliot in 1987: "It is calculated that on the world-market level, 40%
of trade does not go through a free market' but through internal
trading (within the same companies)". In 1994, Jules Kagian said in
"Middle East International" that: "In the United States, more than
80% of the income from goods sold abroad, quantified in dollars,
does not come from exports but from sales by affiliated
companies."
Globalization: The New Mask Of Imperialism
The deification of the market is nothing other than the product of a
development of national capital onto international levels, breaking
down its physical barriers. This phenomena was studied at the start
of this century and was named "imperialism" by Lenin. In this way
the globalization of the economy is just the concentration of value
created by world society in the multinationals. That is to say the
upward fusion of productive, financial, and banking capital.
The number of multinational companies has risen from 7,000 in
1970 to 37,000 in 1992; i.e. former national companies have been
merging with those from other countries and they maintain a
dependance on the largest ones. The economic power of
multinational companies is greater than that of many national
states. Their sales for example have risen to 5.5 billion dollars,
90% of which are made in the imperialist (northern) countries and
just 10% of which are made in the producer (southern) countries.
The economic power of the multinationals gives them an unlimited
political power over national states.
A Little Bit Of History
The development of production created an antagonistic
contradiction between the private ownership of the means of
production and the socialization of production itself between
capital and labor, and this resulted in many crises and two world
wars. These wars allowed the victors to carve up the world markets
again, and by so doing bury their crisis.
At the end of the Second World War, the fusion of capital via the
multinationals permitted largely North American capital, through
the Marshall Plan, to absorb that which remained of European and
Japanese capital. The multinationals made the most of the high
level of development achieved by labor in these countries. However,
despite the fact that the workers were selling their labor in good
conditions, due to the influence of competition from the socialist
countries, it was possible to transcend neither the antagonistic
contradictions between capital and labor, nor those between the
socialized nature of production and the private appropriation of its
products. Without this insight it would be impossible for us to
explain the discontent and strikes in countries such as France.
It may be that the imperialists, or globalizers (to use the new
terminology), have invested huge quantities of money to investigate
how to avoid crises and violent uprisings, and that they have
achieved a degree of mind control through the mass media, but they
have not succeeded in curbing the discontent, which is growing day
by day, and every time it becomes more difficult for them to make
people believe that this system is not responsible for world
problems; in the north they see the waves of immigrants and
millions of dollars are sent as humanitarian "aid" to the "under-
developed" countries. In the post-war era, they secured an internal
market in the north, which increased in depth but not in extension.
This has lead to the development of consumerism. This resulted in
a bourgeoisfication of the working classes, dividing them from their
historic task. The reasoning being that he who can satisfy his basic
needs has no interest in social change. Even though they are
conscious of the fact that their high standard of living comes from
the extermination of whole peoples, after the natural resources of
these nations have been plundered. The imperialist governments
justify this by saying that the peoples of the south are lazy and
ignorant. Despite this, they too have been affected by an incessant
rise in unemployment, which although it may be concealed by the
manipulation of statistics is still undeniably the case and removes
an important sector of the population from the consumer market.
Another way by which they attempt to avoid or recover from their
crises is by developing regional wars far from their centers, such as
those based on religion, racism, territory, etc. These provide
excellent markets for weapons.
But something terrible is happening in the world of globalization.
Year by year profits are going down and the only way they have of
recovering from this is by cutting wages and social benefits, and
this has led to massive waves of redundancies, first in the countries
of the south and more recently in their metropoles in the north.
This tendency has no chance of being reversed. The difference is
that in the north the social effects of these tendencies are dulled by
the welfare state, something we do not have in the south.
The welfare state is deteriorating in the north, at the same time as
the middle classes in Latin America are disappearing, increasing the
flow of external and internal migration in an attempt to improve
their living conditions.
The international proletariat and its organizations entered into a
period of decline due to the influences of "welfare statism" and
"reformism". This postponed the practical and theoretical
development of world socialism for a long time. However, the
enormous increase of the forces of production was not
accompanied by an alternative program, which would not just have
curbed the disproportionate increase in the exploitation of the
forces of labor and the pillaging of the earth's resources. It is, for
example, impossible to ignore the fact that today, despite the fact
that the forces of production have been doubled many times since
the last century and we have entered the phase of a revolution in
information technology and cybernetics, people still work an eight
hour day in the north and much longer in the south. It is therefore
logical that there should be unemployment when one person is
forced to do the work of two or three. It is within the capacity of
any worker to realize that if the working day is not decreased by at
least a third or even a half, then his destiny as redundant is assured.
In Latin America, the famous privatizations, demanded by the IMF
and World Bank, have been nothing more than a cause of
unemployment. However, through the level of development of the
forces of production achieved in Latin America and through the
politicization of our working class, who have been forced into
unemployment and are now in transit (including back to their old
communities in the Andes), there has been a polarization of the
unresolved contradictions in our continent.
We are the weak link in the imperialist chain. Our continent has
passed through many ways, we have made many mistakes from
which we believe we have learned and we now propose to construct
a socialist alternative, because otherwise, if we stay in the realms of
imperialist globalization, we are condemned to unemployment,
misery, and extermination.
Against Neo-liberalism And Globalization!!
Socialism Or Death!!
Venceremos!!
Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA) - 1996
|
|