If you posted naked pictures of yourself as a child, would it be legal?
Skittles
Regular
Would it?
Say you're now in your 20s' and you have naked photos of yourself between ages 5-17, would it be illegal to post them? Or to even post someone else's if they are now an adult and had given you consent to?
You could make a lot of money in the child porn industry if you were the only legal one doing it
Say you're now in your 20s' and you have naked photos of yourself between ages 5-17, would it be illegal to post them? Or to even post someone else's if they are now an adult and had given you consent to?
You could make a lot of money in the child porn industry if you were the only legal one doing it
Comments
penetration
The law states it is illegal to distribute pornographic pictures of children. That's it - it doesn't matter if you (the distributor) are underage or if it is photos of yourself.
however in practice if it's photos of yourself you can probably successfully claim that it is "art".
http://www.cfcamerica.org/news/woman-charged-with-possession-of-child-pornography-for-taking-photos-of-herself-breastfeeding
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/01/mom-defends-soldier-accused-of-having-child-porn.html
http://www.momlogic.com/2009/09/are_bathtime_pictures_child_po.php
What if I photoshopped a child to look naked? That should be legal, shouldn't it?
Fix'd.
Nope, illegal. Photoshopped fakes, 3D nude children, drawings, erotic fiction, etc. are all illegal in most places, especially the big countries. Though some of them are legal to possess if you made them yourself and you don't distribute or plan on distributing them. It's bullshit.
Another thing that is bullshit is how pictures of boys without shirts on is okay, but pictures of topless girls are illegal. I WANT MY DFC'S DAMMIT!
Edit: I was trying to find an article someone had mentioned elsewhere, but I can't find it. Supposedly a man had been arrested for possessing LEGAL images of nude women that had underage girl's faces taped to them. I was trying to find the article because it sounds like bullshit, but it wouldn't surprise me. >_<
Yep, and you would think some of that stuff like the erotic fiction, 3D children, or idk statues of nude children would be legal because they have artistic value, but nope. >_<
However, those nude pictures of Brooke shields when she was underage and even the movie Pretty Baby are completely legal as they count as works of art, and probably because it involves a celebrity.
Did any of you even read that one? She was charged with possesing MULTIPUL naked pictures. She really is a sick bitch. When I see someone I haven't seen in a long time, my first instinct isn't to take a bunch of naked pictures with them. That one is pretty fucked up.
That one is EXTREMELY fucked up.
You know what, too? It's the fault of people like the OP, who try to profit off of ABUSED children. If it weren't for sick fucks who get off on kiddy porn, parents, like me, would be able to take innocent photos.
Well you can blame the government for not giving pedophiles any alternatives either. Taking away what they get off on is not going to make THEM go away, and it just gives them a few options, all of which are not something a parent would want.
Also, do you think a regular old naked picture of a kid is abuse?
This.
The one way at the top looks scary. The rest are nice though, and I don't even like black and white photography much. :thumbsup:
No, I can blame the fags who try to get around it. If the regular naked picture of a child was taken with the intentions of making porn then yes, it is abuse.
Everyone has their desires and needs. If making an illegal want legal, then wouldn't everyone benefit? The community gets less pedos committing molestation and rape because they can find it on the web, the pedos have a legal way to satisfy their needs, and the distributor profits!
Everyone profits!
But wut about teh childrenzz:o:o
They would be you grown up...
I never got molested or put in child porn:mad::mad:
Other than the fact it's legal, making more children getting molested because it's "okay".:facepalm: Jesus christ you're a dumb ass.
Why so butthurt over seeing my butt as a child?
Ohh my bad. Then yeah fuck the children.
Okay, what about when nobody posts the pictures because NORMAL people don't post naked pictures of themselves as children?
The only downfall is the legitimacy of the photos, and that they are in fact the person you're buying from.
Either way its still illegal as all the loopholes are blocked. Back to the chalkboard, I guess.
What is normal really......
You certainly wont find any normal people on totse. Normal dosnt really exist though.