I'm feeling more and more imperialist lately

Negrophobe

It seems only pussies and jealous motherfuckers bitch about imperialism. If it had fascist principles, corporatist and national syndicalist economic system and philosophy; rather than capitalist and made use of splendid isolation then imperialism can make a great world and use of it, building great nations in the process.

Whatever infrastructure that exists in South Africa and Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is largely the work of the British and the Boers; also taking into serious consideration that those countries were seized by the niggers in an illegal and unjust war against their white governments, with Mugabe and Mandela, 2 of the biggest and most murderous terrorists.

South Africa black-owned farms 'failing' 90%

Meanwhile, Mugabe is causing even his own people to live in abject suffering.

Mr. Moo

As much as black people bitch about slavery, Blacks in america are better off than blacks anywhere. They say reperation id say your welcome if we left you in Africa you would probably be dead from aids

Box

lolwut r u tolking about? u better stfu befor i tape u inside of me

Negrophobe

DirtySanchez

Imperialism and globalism are a big reason we have these muds in white country's now. Through the slave trade for example it brought the Negroes to America. I'm of the belief that the races need to stay in their own country's and this also includes white people. The white race brought itself into contact with the mud races and through greed and imperialism basically caused this horrible racial situation were in now.

I do sympathize with the whites in Rhodesia and SA the fact is they never belonged their in the first place. In fact Imperialism can easily be considered the final stage of Capitalism. The focus needs to be on building an all white nation and perfecting that country. There is no logical reason to expand into the mud countries after that is accomplished.

Imperialism is nothing more than Capitalist greed wanting to increase their profits by exploiting and exporting capital to other nations and effectively implementing a global version of Capitalism. Fuck Globalism and Fuck imperialism. I believe Socialism to be the best economic policy and it needs to be perfected in One country before even thinking about expanding it into other nations.

JustAnotherAsshole

I was watching a documentary on Netflix about Mugabe giving all of the white farms to black Africans. Shitty situation, especially given that most of the new black farmers cannot farm lol.

Racism is taking its toll once again.

acid_drop

DirtySanchez wrote: »

I'm of the belief that the races need to stay in their own country's and this also includes white people. The white race brought itself into contact with the mud races and through greed and imperialism basically caused this horrible racial situation were in now.

We had better get the fuck out of the U.S. then. Seeing as how there weren't any white folk here until a few hundred years ago. :facepalm:

DirtySanchez

acid_drop wrote: »

We had better get the fuck out of the U.S. then. Seeing as how there weren't any white folk here until a few hundred years ago. :facepalm:

Like I've said before I fully support whites leaving America but only if the non whites leave Europe.

JustAnotherAsshole

DirtySanchez wrote: »

Like I've said before I fully support whites leaving America but only if the non whites leave Europe.

That doesn't seem rational. Why should native Americans being returned their land be contingent upon Blacks and Arabs leaving Europe?

Just for the sake of argument.

DirtySanchez

JustAnotherAsshole wrote: »

That doesn't seem rational. Why should native Americans being returned their land be contingent upon Blacks and Arabs leaving Europe?

Just for the sake of argument.

Because I believe that just as whites had no business coming to the Americas the non whites have no business in our homelands. I'm of the belief that all the races belong in their own homelands. Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, Spics in mexico and other states south of the border. I think imperialism was wrong but so is multiculturalism. The races simply weren't meant to live together.

Rolf

DirtySanchez wrote: »

Like I've said before I fully support whites leaving America but only if the non whites leave Europe.

Rolf is willing to bet Europeans don't want the entire white population of the United States back in their countries, states Rolf, even if it would remove all those non-white people. Logistics would also be quite difficult, if not impossible, states Rolf.

JustAnotherAsshole

DirtySanchez wrote: »

Because I believe that just as whites had no business coming to the Americas the non whites have no business in our homelands. I'm of the belief that all the races belong in their own homelands. Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, Spics in mexico and other states south of the border. I think imperialism was wrong but so is multiculturalism. The races simply weren't meant to live together.

Right, but saying that you'll only give it back to native Americans if non whites leave Europe is ridiculous, because the natives have nothing to do with the non-whites in Europe.

Rolf wrote: »

Rolf is willing to bet Europeans don't want the entire white population of the United States back in their countries, states Rolf, even if it would remove all those non-white people. Logistics would also be quite difficult, if not impossible, states Rolf.

Yeah, that's why..

Negrophobe

Maybe imperialistic was the wrong term.

The financial resources were the debts which were owed to us by foreigners on account of the export surplus which the productive power of British industry, and the hard work and self-denial of British workers, had sent abroad during several generations. The man power was to be found in those parts of the British Empire which were thrown away: the oriental portions of British Empire. The financial resources could have been used for the temporary employment of that man power at good wages and under good conditions in such undeveloped areas as Africa.

That labour would have been only too glad to go there for a time in order quickly to earn enough for an early retirement to leisure and comfort. Some Europeans go to America with exactly the same idea of earning enough to enable them to go home and retire in ease at the earliest possible moment.

In 1939 we possessed both the financial resources and the oriental man power which could have done much of the pioneer work; quite apart from our own resources of vigorous and skilled manhood which the politicians chose instead to send to European battlefields. Now we have none of these resources which a great Imperial power might have used for the permanent benefit of the British people, if it had not preferred the loan and interest game of the financier, which always ends in war.

Also with "imperialism", overpopulation can be cut down massively; a surplus of people could be used in the military as long as the state is able to feed them. IMO, British imperial hegemony should have been preserved, as it had a dedication to world peace. You may want to read Oswald Mosley's autobiography. It is mostly a political biography where he answers all of the criticism against him and he does a good job of it. Certainly a must read; Mosley had brilliant ideas.

Here's a good part from The Doctrine of Fascism:

The Fascist State expresses the will to exercise power and to command. Here the Roman tradition is embodied in a conception of strength. Imperial power, as understood by the Fascist doctrine, is not only territorial, or military, or commercial; it is also spiritual and ethical. An imperial nation, that is to say a nation a which directly or indirectly is a leader of others, can exist without the need of conquering a single square mile of territory. Fascism sees in the imperialistic spirit -- i.e. in the tendency of nations to expand - a manifestation of their vitality. In the op*posite tendency, which would limit their interests to the home country, it sees a symptom of decadence. Peoples who rise or rearise are imperialistic; renunciation is characteristic of dying peoples. The Fascist doctrine is that best suited to the tendencies and feelings of a people which, like the Italian, after lying fallow during centuries of foreign servitude, are now reasserting itself in the world.

But imperialism implies discipline, the coordination of efforts, a deep sense of duty and a spirit of self-sacrifice. This explains many aspects of the practical activity of the regime, and the direction taken by many of the forces of the State, as also the severity which has to be exercised towards those who would oppose this spontaneous and inevitable movement of XXth century Italy by agitating outgrown ideologies of the XIXth century, ideologies rejected wherever great experiments in political and social transfor*mations are being dared.

Never before have the peoples thirsted for authority, direction, order, as they do now. If each age has its doctrine, then innumerable symptoms indicate that the doctrine of our age is the Fascist. That it is vital is shown by the fact that it has aroused a faith; that this faith has conquered souls is shown by the fact that Fascism can point to its fallen heroes and its martyrs.

Fascism has now acquired throughout the world that universally which belongs to all doctrines which by achieving self-expression represent a moment in the history of human thought.

Negrophobe

Mussolini on war and empire.

From What is Fascism?

Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. It thus repudiates the doctrine of Pacifism -- born of a renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice. War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have courage to meet it. All other trials are substitutes, which never really put men into the position where they have to make the great decision -- the alternative of life or death....

For Fascism, the growth of empire, that is to say the expansion of the nation, is an essential manifestation of vitality, and its opposite a sign of decadence. Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and renunciation is a sign of decay and of death. Fascism is the doctrine best adapted to represent the tendencies and the aspirations of a people, like the people of Italy, who are rising again after many centuries of abasement and foreign servitude. But empire demands discipline, the coordination of all forces and a deeply felt sense of duty and sacrifice: this fact explains many aspects of the practical working of the regime, the character of many forces in the State, and the necessarily severe measures which must be taken against those who would oppose this spontaneous and inevitable movement of Italy in the twentieth century, and would oppose it by recalling the outworn ideology of the nineteenth century - repudiated wheresoever there has been the courage to undertake great experiments of social and political transformation; for never before has the nation stood more in need of authority, of direction and order. If every age has its own characteristic doctrine, there are a thousand signs which point to Fascism as the characteristic doctrine of our time. For if a doctrine must be a living thing, this is proved by the fact that Fascism has created a living faith; and that this faith is very powerful in the minds of men is demonstrated by those who have suffered and died for it.

I agree with it. I am pro-British Empire.

Slave of the Beast

As the saying goes, 'better to have your own empire than be part of someone else's.'.

Unless you're a fan of the Guardian in which case burning with guilt that you aren't descended from slaves, and having remorse for those who are, is almost obligatory.