Editing the Wiki + ED pages?
Wiki - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOTSE
ED - Meh actually, screw ED.
These pages are currently out of date and hosting incorrect information, including links which don't work, etc. We need to get these fixed pretty soon, preferably before Operation FYW. If people start googling for TOTSE and come across an outdated article with a bunch of wrong information and dead links (and even a link to Zoklet, I think), then that's a load of potential activity down the drain, and wasted effort.
ED - Meh actually, screw ED.
These pages are currently out of date and hosting incorrect information, including links which don't work, etc. We need to get these fixed pretty soon, preferably before Operation FYW. If people start googling for TOTSE and come across an outdated article with a bunch of wrong information and dead links (and even a link to Zoklet, I think), then that's a load of potential activity down the drain, and wasted effort.
Comments
Seriously? That's retarded. How many times have you tried to edit?
Maybe if enough people tried consecutively, and made it apparent that our editing is legit, they might leave it all on there.
As for ED, uh, yeah. Is an ED article suppose to even have a point of view that agrees with others? Isn't the purpose to intentionally misrepresent facts for Dramatic purposes? Don't they purposely contradict everyone's opinion?
I don't suppose you got butt hurt because ED talks shit about everything, even totse?
I mean, what do they support? Anonymous? It's obvious they attempt to support nothing at all. That's their style, why invade and censor others? Isn't that hypocritical?
Maybe you should focus less on third party sources of information and begin making the text files accurate and factual, so that they can more easily be circulated and relied upon for information. We don't have to edit old ones, just focus on revolutionizing the quality and accuracy of new ones, while also drawing attention to the site.
Bombshock holds totses old place on that search. I suppose you're okay with that?
Why focus on the wikipedia totse articles? Write your own wikipedia .info articles. Maybe that would help more.
But honestly, did you learn about the original totse from wikipedia? Or did you google "how to make bombs," "household highs," that kind of thing?
Personally, I don't want this site to be exactly like the original totse, or any other site. It requires some adaption to this era. But if you don't agree, maybe you should be looking into more "traditional" means of popularizing the site.
I just hope you realize, for many years, totse was on the first page of google results under "how to make bombs." Claiming this site to be totse, without holding that place on a google search page, is absolutely blasphemous.
Bombshock now holds totse's old place on the google page. I suppose you're okay with that though?