Political correctness
Negrophobe
Regular
To begin with this thread I'd like to start off with a written piece I agree on, it's a part of the unabomber manifesto
The psychology of modern leftism
6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled
society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness
of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism
can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of
modern society in general.
7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism
could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the
movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be
called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in
mind mainly socialists, collectivists, "politically correct" types,
feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the
like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these
movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing
leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological
type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by
"leftism" will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of
leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)
8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less
clear than we would wish, but there doesn't seem to be any remedy
for this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate
way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main
driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling
the whole truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant
to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the
extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the
19th and early 20th century.
9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we
call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization." Feelings of
inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while
oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of
modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
Feelings of inferiority
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings in
the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low selfesteem,
feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies,
defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and
that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of
modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is
said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we
conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This
tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or
not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend.
They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities
and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms
"negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian,
a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine
equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations
have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some
animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word "pet"
and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftish
anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about
primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative.
They want to replace the world "primitive" by "nonliterate." They
seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any
primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that
primitive cultures are inferior to ours. We merely point out the
hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect"
terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian
immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of
activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed"
group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness
has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure
employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are
heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class
families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of
groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated
(American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior.
The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would
never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is
precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they
identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women,
Indians, etc. are inferior; we are only making a point about leftist
psychology.)
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that
women may not be as strong and as capable as men.
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong,
good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western
civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons
that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond
with their real motives. They say they hate the West because it is
warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where
these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures,
the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he grudgingly admits that
they exist; whereas he enthusiastically points out (and often greatly
exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization.
Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for
hating America and the West. He hates America and the West
because they are strong and successful.
16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative,"
"enterprise," "optimism," etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist
vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants
society to solve everyone's problems for them, satisfy everyone's
needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who
has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own
problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the
concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus
on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic
tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of
accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was
left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science,
objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is
true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of
scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective
reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish
philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically
analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved
emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these
concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing,
their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is
successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist
hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as
true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed,
inferior). The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot
tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior
and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection
by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ
tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human
abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some
persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give
society the credit or blame for an individual's ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society's, because he has
not been brought up properly.
19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of
inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a
ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in
himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he
can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and
his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior.[1]
But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so
ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong
and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong
only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with
which he identifies himself.
20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest
by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or
racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but
many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they
prefer masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.
21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the
leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle
cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too
prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.
Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of
benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For
example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black
people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or
dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a
diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal
and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative
action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take
such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs.
Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems
serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and
frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black
people, because the activists' hostile attitude toward the white
majority tends to intensify race hatred.
22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have
to invent problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for
making a fuss.
23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an
accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It
is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.
Comments
Britain's institutions are infected with political correctness which is damaging society and silencing it. Political correctness relies on an argument's emotional appeal, and labelling one group as "victims" while others were "oppressors", political correctness silences opposition. An example I will give is with the BNP, even though I don't support them or vote for them as it's pointless and Nick Griffin is a fraud just like David Duke, but every time Nick Griffin speaks on the TV or radio he is dismissed, cut off or called a buzzword like "fascist" (which he most certainly is fucking not), "racist" (so what?) or a "bigot". Bearing in mind this is all said before hearing him out or knowing anything about politics or the BNP's/Griffin's actual policies.
Here is a brilliant video of Griffin shooting down a BBC reporter.
The most racism, sexism and homophobia in Britain now comes from these "victims" themselves, in ethnic and racial minority communities, because their views are rarely challenged, as challenging them equates to being a bigot in the eyes of today's society.
However there are double standards when it comes to anti-white racism and snide comments by those such as Dianne Abbott.
Also the way the left wing uses children to push their agenda and message in schools. Now imagine if the BNP/national front/british peoples' party or a group of fascists made up a song opposing multiculturalism/multiracialism... it's be world wide news, it's be down right brainwashing
But not when the left does it.
Here is another interesting article on political correctness.
http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/prcs47.php
Here is a hilarious article relating to anti-racism.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/antiracism-laws-mutate-racism-into-newer-stronger,659/
Lol at the emotive language used in that article; "disease", "virulent forms of hatred", "vaccinate the populace" etc. all your typical jew-talk and buzzwords repeated over and over to try and hammer their point; and what better to have a nigger as the director.
Seems familiar to me.
It's not possible to "cure" racism. It jumps right back up. Like those whack-a-mole arcade games, you hit one and more pop up. Go against nature and you get raped.
Don't think that there aren't alot of racists; there are more racists than you think, they just like to stay closeted and lie that they're not racist and use double-talk (like Scwhipe) because they're afraid of what society will do to them, losing their job, hate crimes on their file etc. When the shit really hits the fan big time and the destruction of the infrastructure they get rid of that and come out in the open, people are now merely just whilst the pot is being stirred.
No shit, when political correctness stifles any questioning, disallows people from getting on TV, kicking kids out of school, etc. It's a false conversion.
When you come out as an honest racist and speak of race it scares people because they've managed to surpress their private racism.
When it comes back more publicly it's going to come back with a fury. It'll be interwoven with those who hate the current MOG as well; they may feel they're not racist, but they'll work with you against the current enemies. Who cares as long as it suits our purpose, and most likely theirs.
As you can see it outlines that teachers were too anxious to get involved, out of fear of being “racist”. We can see from the article that it’s only racist if it’s a white Briton standing up for them-selves, or showing pride in their country and heritage.
I also forgot to mention the fact that BNP members or any other "far-right" party (an inaccurate term) are not allowed to be prison guards, police officers, teachers (it encourages snitching on teachers who are BNP supporters and members) or any other job position.
Heres an interesting quote from Che Guevara that Social Marxists seem to forget or ignore
As you can see Che who was a true Marxist would be disgusted by the politically correct assholes wearing his face on there shirt. He also hated queers saw the Jew for what they are.
The Soviet Union is another example with there closed borders. They didn't tolerate non white immigrants in there country like Russia has today.
In an ironic way the politically correct doctrine of Affirmative action is racist because there saying niggers should be held to a lower standard than whites but good luck getting a liberal to admit that.
Here in America recently a high ranking member in the department of justice admitted there is an ongoing policy which states that niggers are incapable of being racist or committing hate crimes but nobody talks about this fact for fear of being called racist.
The cowardice that people feel when it comes to rationally discussing race is incredible. There self hatred is so great that even in the face of science and genetic evidence they deny race exists. I swear some whites get more offended by the word nigger than blacks do. Also if whites are so bad why do the niggers refuse to let us live separate from them? It's because they know deep in there heart that the nigger was never capable of running a society on there own as evidenced by Haiti and Africa with post apartheid Africa being the best example of what happens when white rule ends in favor of Mud rule.
The Feminist is another great example of this disease known as liberalism and yes I'm convinced it's a mental disease. Do they really loath themselves so much that unless a women has the right to do every last fucking thing a man does they wont be happy? Feminism is another movement that completly goes against nature.
Very very rarely do I ever agree with Michael Savage, being the neo-con fuck that he is, but he summed it up pretty well in this video about liberals/leftists as well.
Just recently that one nigger radio host got fired just for saying being around Muslims on an airplane makes him nervous. Thats how far political correctness has gone.
For anyone who says niggers arent capable of a hate crime read up on these murders that of course got very little national attention because the killers were black even though the niggers admitted to race being a motive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom
An even better example of Black on White hate crimes was the "Zebra Murders" back in the 70's by radical Black Supremacists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_murders
I know it wasn't a completely serious article, hence why I said it was hilarious; but it does have an underlying and valid point that anti-racism breeds more racism than was already there to begin with.
It has nothing to do with self hatred. You need to stay off of Faux news and talk radio. The only thing the republicans care about is tax breaks for rich people. They manipulate you by catering to people who are pro-gun, pro-christianity, anti-abortion and anti-gay.
I'm in favor of tax cuts for the middle class, not the rich. I'm in favor of gun control so dumbshits can't get them. I don't like wars because they're a huge fat waste of taxpayer money. You want to talk about government spending as a problem? Look at the wars. They don't create jobs here. They don't promote growth in any industries here. It's wasteful spending.
I'm not a republican.:facepalm: Theres a difference between True Marxism (Stalinism) which I support and Social Marxism which I despise. Republicans and democrats are both 2 sides of the same rotten coin. I don't listen to talk radio either and I dont have cable so I haven't even seen fox news in months.
I hate the so called Socialism of Obama and Bill ayers but I'm about as far from a capitalist as you can get. BTW check out check my thread in religion. I'm not a Christian anymore. I have rejected the inferior ideas of religion. When I talk of my hatred for Social Marxists I mean social Marxists not the true ideals of Marxism-Leninism. I've never hated TRUE marxism but I always have and forever will hate what liberals and people on revleft turned it into and these are the people with the self loathing.
Just because I hate niggers and queers doesn't mean I'm republican. Actually my Socialist leanings have been growing increasingly radical at a rapid pace. So your whole argument against my post falls apart now. I embrace an ideology that has been building in me for a long time. It's a revolutionary ideal that combines the Social ideas of Hitler with the revolutionary ideals and economic ways of Lenin and Stalin. A kind of National Communism if you will.
You're ignorant and ideologically twisted.