What do you care anyways Dfg? It's not like you'll ever have sex with her, and photoshopping the pic makes her better fapping material for you. Thread title ought to be "Thanks to the editing staff at Rolling Stone," or perhaps "Photoshopu Ackbar!"
Agreed. Why can't they just leave it like that? Are people so full of shit in their false perception of what tits should look like? :mad:
I was going to say something to the effect of "Wow, her tits look like tits before photochops." Don't care for her, or her image, but she is quite pretty in the before picture. Magazine covers always freak me out with the photochops though. Makes women look plastic.
Comments
I think she looks hotter in the first one though honestly. I don't understand why people think stick-thin legs and thighs are appealing.
i would piss in her eye sockets in a heart beat
Agreed. Why can't they just leave it like that? Are people so full of shit in their false perception of what tits should look like? :mad:
Fixed.
Virgin detected.
yep
fucking pig
... lol
I was going to say something to the effect of "Wow, her tits look like tits before photochops." Don't care for her, or her image, but she is quite pretty in the before picture. Magazine covers always freak me out with the photochops though. Makes women look plastic.